Four out of 10 college dailies are no longer printing daily.
How do I know? I checked the status of every college paper listed in a 1997 study by John Bodle that identified 101 college dailies. Back then, Bodle was trying to assess the relative independence of college newspapers from their host institution.
In doing so, he created a system to describe and categorize the schools based on their funding and structure. Looking across his original typology (which may or may not be accurate in today’s environment), the fate of college dailies has been fairly consistent. However, there is slightly more daily print publication still happening at college newspapers with more of an independent tilt. But not by much. And it’s also worth noting that if Bodle’s survey was administered again, we’d probably see some shift in the typology. A few more schools may have gained or lost aspects of independence in the last 20 years.
|Type||% not daily|
|Moderately curriculum-based (25)||44%|
|Moderately independent (27)||30%|
|Strong independent (12)||33%|
Of course, a vast majority of all of these newspapers — probably all but one or two schools — are publishing online daily and have potentially greater reach and influence than their 1997 counterparts. Because audience analytics data is often fiercely guarded, it would be hard to know which college daily has the largest digital footprint.
You can view a full data sheet here showing each institution’s newspaper along with the original typology and its publishing frequency as it could be determined in fall 2015.
If you know of a college daily that’s not on my list but should be, drop me a note in the comments.
*I added a link to my source table and edited this post after publication for clarity.
This might be one of those “duh” concepts, but when I first encountered it, it was oddly more like “a-ha!”
The task of organizing information has never been more vital. We are now awash in information. What makes information useful is how it is organized. The discipline of organizing information can be called “information architecture.” And to keep that idea going, anyone who works to organize information can be called an “information architect.” So a skilled journalist can be an information architect. Editors and page designers, yes. Infographic artists, of course. Web designers. All sorts of people involved in communication.
There is a simple tool that can help anyone become an information architect. It’s easy to remember, too. You can thank Richard Wurman for it. Here it is: LATCH.
- Location: Where something is physically located: maps, parts of a cell, addresses
- Alphabet: Listing of text ranked by alphabetical order: rosters, phone books, encyclopedias
- Time: Duration or placement in time: dates, time spans, timelines, processes
- Category: Groupings of things by something they have in common: think of departments in a department store or sections in a newspaper
- Hierarchy: Ranked by values, either quantitative or qualitative: money, height, military rank, size, importance
Applying one organizational factor against another is how we get things like charts and graphs, and insight. For example: the value of stock prices (hierarchy) of tech companies vs. manufacturing (category) over three years (time).